Re-Send Password?
4 of 8 Dark Passage
Dec 22, '13

Collating the detail and resources that contribute to this writing seems so clinical and void of compassion or reason but the truth is, the orchestrators of globalist control are completely void of any concern for the fellow men and quite simply psychopathic of mind and intent. The sheer extent of horror unleashed on mankind to bring about their dark designs would have catastrophic consequences upon humanity. Methodology would require extreme measures and having evolved the mechanics with which to bring about change, it would then require the fuel to orchestrate the route in which it would take and now, by documenting its passage I am fully aware my words will appear paranoid even hysterical, but rest assured there is growing proof opened up to any through research through the internet and I for one have to believe that as soon as the growing majority are made aware of what their ancestors and families have had to endure, then the foul intent of global control will be recognized and rebuked and independence of thought and actions will prevail over ‘big brother’ control.

Formerly the route to expanding control and influence had been by conquest, with modest increase of interest or influence frequently embracing political marriage between influential and royal families, suffering covert hostility partnered by matrimonial bliss. That said some marriages of convenience could be sabotaged such as that by Queen Boudicca’s daughters by Roman design and tactical reasoning. However the Roman Empire has come and gone and other empires would grow over the course of time including Great Britain, France, Spain and Holland to name but a few. Whilst one particular French emperor had aspired to stand in the glaze of Roman glory and some might say that our very own Queen Victoria had similar designs, but that doesn’t count coz she was a true Brit. Notwithstanding the gross home based popularity of another national leader would go some way to emulate his former French counterpart still doomed to failure even though he had received covert sponsorship at the outset, he was in the course of time to suffer ignominious defeat at the hands of another embryonic nation that was fast expanding its influence from across the sea. Causative reasons accompany controversial facts linked to the stability and political machinations altering national boundaries or areas of influence but above all, precipitate a new and almost invisible method of domination that would enslave humanity without them even knowing it. These grand designs required the complete dissolution of former trading preferences and favouritisms to replace them with an unseen malignant tumour that crept into the body and soul of global populations regardless of nation, religion, culture, or creed. Indiscriminate, this cancerous spread has no conscience in inserting its insidious design into every aspect of man kinds lives, consequently contrasted by its very absence resulting in poverty introducing a new form of slavery, enforced by imposition of threat of denial. Success would also demand implementation by stealthily implementing a culture that would diminish morals and ethics, whilst reducing pride, dignity, even sense of belonging or purpose in the most seditious of ways.

Former personal ambition fuelled by national pride would on occasion accrue self justification in the genuine belief in spreading the word of the Christian God and supersede all indigenous religions by imposing doctrinal power over man’s ancient belief systems, whilst national boundaries segmented global power bases dependent upon inter dependence and political acquiescence. Whilst in compensation for diminishing precedence of one racial group or another, nations nurtured allegiances closeted in the simplistic belief of strength in numbers or might is right. Meantime major change would require a cataclysmic event like a cauldron about to boil and present the perfect opportunity to centralize power and domination that had no interest in the cost because that was merely human life. It was to be called The Great War which stole its grand title from the years of Napoleonic ambition. However its advent would also curtail and delay the problem of growing dissension from the ranks of lower working classes and female emancipation, whilst implementing change by conquest without conscience, supporting nature’s natural ability to achieve survival by population reduction.

Meantime disputes raged to varying degrees that embroiled the Austro-Hungarian Empire, along with Germany and its overseas colonies or the Ottoman Empire. Whereby England enjoyed a fruitful and quite promising bounty from its far reaching empire and any real change to any of these substantive empires could only be advanced by challenging vested interests and potentially embroiling mankind in a global conflagration that would by deliberate and covert means, entice alternative centres of power by tacit consent. Whereby the jingoism of patriotism was drowned out by the outrage voiced rose to a clamour following the assassination of the Arch Duke Ferdinand by a Serbian national, whilst the fact that he was Jewish would further lend fuel to the fire of a maelstrom still lurking like an ever present shadow on the distant horizon. Meantime central European powers formed alliances between Germany, Austria-Hungary, Bulgaria (joined in 1915) and the Ottoman Empire. Whereby Allied Powers- included the United Kingdom, France, Russia, Serbia, to a much lesser degree, Japan and the United States (joined in 1917). American involvement was far more significant in extending itself physically and by sheer weight of number, implanting itself on foreign soil in order to introduce the first tentative steps toward becoming a global police force.

The real causes of the war are far reaching and highly complex and stemmed from a decade of colonial and imperial disputes at the end of the nineteenth century, whilst some of the more significant long term causes were the increasing growth of nationalism across Europe. Unresolved territorial disagreements resulted in a complex system of alliances, with the perceived breakdown of power balance resulted in a cleverly contrived arms race that by its nature was both aggressive and threatening. Imperial and colonial preferences would initiate strong rivalry for wealth, power and prestige, further to economic and military rivalry in industry and trade. Germany also marched down the path to war in the misperception that Britain would remain neutral, further complicated by delays and misunderstandings in diplomatic communications. Theoretically this nation engaged itself in the First World War in defence of the previous century’s liberal values and used Germany’s invasion of Belgium as an excuse to rush to their aid and, for the first of two misconstrued liabilities, it had no direct link to honour an alliance with France. In essence this declaration of war was little more than an excuse for imperial rivalry to duke it out and strike out for dominance once and for all but the carnage this engagement would evoke would become unparalleled. Thus an intricate web of trenches were excavated from east to west across Europe whilst the United States dug in to its separatism with an eager eye cast firmly upon the auspice of economic growth and industrial potential.

At the outset Secretary of State William Jennings Bryan anticipated that large banking interests would be deeply interested in a wide range of opportunities for large profits benefiting the enormous U.S., industrial capability. This realization would eagerly support President Wilson’s' 'keeping us out of the war' mandate given to secure his place in office in 1916. Meanwhile the French firm of Rothschild Freres cabled Morgan and Company in New York requesting the flotation of a loan of $100,000,000. The application included a clause declaring a substantial part was to be left in the U.S., to pay for French purchases of American goods. Thus the first recorded war loan set precedence for future profiteering and national domination through fiscal control. Human resources in Europe were being depleted on an unprecedented scale and American inclusion would insert an overwhelming level of manpower. However inherent memories and bitterness lay in slumber regarding the War of Independence and that applied equally to the redundant alliance created with France during that time. Such complexities and conflicting influences regarding a decision as to which side would they fight persisted, after all the ethnic origin of immigration was widespread throughout Europe, as one group or another lobbied energetically for support; knowing full well the extent of US. manpower and ordinance would transform the outcome massively. That said, fiscal weight through war loans had no concern for national boundaries no more than industrial production which cared even less. On a human level a fair portion of United States citizens had their family roots in Europe and some adventurous souls rallied back to their respective flags at the call to arms, but on the whole, the people of America maintained their treasured separatism.

Behind the scenes global manipulation may best be measured by a letter Winston Churchill wrote to Walter Runciman, the president of Britain’s Board of Trade, where he wrote,

'It is most important to attract neutral shipping to our shores in the hope of embroiling the United States with Germany. For our part we want the traffic – the more the better, and, if some of it gets into trouble, then better still.'

Altering the separatist attitude would require an event of some magnitude in which to enrage the American public and stir them into action, thus unseen engineers of dubious intent selected the more profitable course of action toward advancing their own agenda and orchestrate an event they incorrectly assumed would fill that role admirably. But to the planner’s great surprise, this crime against humanity was at the outset, simply not harsh enough. The plan was conceived behind closed doors and was born out of a somewhat innocuous action when the owner of the Cunard shipping line turned a vessel over to the First Lord of The Admiralty, Winston Churchill. This craft became registered as a serving ship of the British Royal Navy under the control of the Admiralty and the British Government. The next step was to despatch it to New York where it was loaded with six million rounds of ammunition purchased by France and England to aid their war effort. The acquisition of munitions was subject only to the power of purchase rather than loyalty yet clearly of prime importance to sustaining the war effort. In particular this transfer of munitions was betrayed by deliberate design to Imperial German secret services. This ploy was further supported by the revelation that by the end of January 1914; British Intelligence had broken German codes and was subsequently informing the admiralty of the departure of every enemy submarine as it left harbour, as well as its field of operation, with particular reference to when and where the U boats prowled within English Territorial waters.

Regardless of how obscene or grotesque the slaughter was on mainland Europe there was a quirky code of conduct still in existence between the Knights of the Sky and certain naval vessels, whereby U-Boat captains would signal a chosen enemy vessel to inform them he intended to sink them and would go on to allow sufficient time for the crew to abandon ship. However if the nature of the vessel made this impracticable, an alternative was to place advertisement of intent in the cities newspapers distributed in adjoining harbours and docklands, even post notification on billboards or distribution of leaflets in close proximity to the harbour of embarkation. This was the case in New York in the months leading up to May 1915. In addition the German embassy in New York gave legitimate interviews on local radio advising civilians to not seek passage on this particular vessel as they had every intention of sinking it and sink it they did. The German diplomatic attempts to advertise their intent warned potential passengers the ship was sailing into a war zone and thus liable to attack, which was no less than advance warning of intent. To further supplement this advice, a senate advisor, upon receiving prior warning from an unknown source promised “he would endeavour to persuade the President (Woodrowe Wilson) to warn American citizens to not sail on this particular vessel the ‘Lusitania’ as its cargo was well known to him”, but to his shame the President chose to simply ignore this advice and a reader may well conclude, Was this under orders from above, work it out for yourself?

Embarking as planned, the ocean liner set sail on May 7th, 1915, and in due time slowed to maintain a prior appointment to join up with the Royal Naval escort vessel H.M.S.Juno when reaching British waters. Unbeknown to the ship’s captain and for reasons best known to himself, Winston Churchill ordered the escorting vessel to return to port thus leaving the Lusitania to its fate. Twelve hundred and one people lost their lives as the Lusitania was sunk off the coast of County Cork by a U Boat. This attack took place even though the First Lord of The Admiralty had been advised that three U Boats were in the direct vicinity of the liner, meantime the Royal Naval vessel formerly assigned to the 11th cruiser Squadron operating from Ireland was mysteriously redirected to serve in the Persian Gulf. It was even made public in the book 'The Intimate Papers of Colonel House' that conversation between Colonel House and Sir Edward Grey, the Foreign Secretary of England, where a question was posed,

“What would the Americans do if the Germans sink an ocean liner with American passengers on board?” Where the reply came,

“ I believe that a flame of indignation would sweep the United States and that by itself would be sufficient to carry us into the war” and it was proclaimed as “the foulest act of wilful murder ever committed on the seas” but who was actually guilty of what appears based on historical evidence to be no less than premeditated murder?

Further publication included the Los Angeles Times that reviewed Colin Simpson’s book and concluded: 'The Lusitania proves beyond a reasonable doubt that the British government connived at the sinking of the passenger ship in order to lure America into World War I. The Germans, whose torpedo struck the liner, were the unwitting accomplices or victims of a plot probably concocted by Winston Churchill himself'.

Contrary to political intrigue, this single act was not enough to cause national indignation as anticipated, no more were the sinking of four further American vessels over the following years. No more were explosive acts of sabotage on ships in US harbours where the culprits were never discovered. It was news of an event far closer to home that was anticipated would affront the people of the United States to get involved and this occurred following an alleged intercepted telegram decoded by British cryptographers of Room 40.instructing Ambassador Eckardt that;

'If it appeared as if the United States were going to enter the war, he was to approach the Mexican government with a proposal for an alliance that would lend German help in Mexico reclaiming the American previously disputed states of Texas, New Mexico and Arizona.”

The mere suggestion exaggerated with much hype through national media evoked a backlash that would allow President Wilson to make the long awaited declaration against Imperial Germany without senate obstruction. It was April 6th 1917 and of course this declaration came as a great relief to the orchestrator’s of massive war loans, after all the U.S. held huge economic investments with the British and French and if they were to lose the war, this would prove an unacceptable loss (amounting to about two billion dollars, while Germany only borrowed a mere 27 million). France and England had been funding their war with US loans whilst securing massive amounts of arms and ordinance from United States industry on extended credit. Regardless of any other considerations the US wanted to make sure it got its money back, quite regardless of the fact that it was money in print only and in material substance never really existed at all. American soldiers took up positions alongside their allies being presented in the 'homeland' as not only a moral duty but also an economic obligation.

There does however remain one mere aside to the strange goings on during the First World War, in which I refer to the mechanics of the global chess game where German authorities perhaps sensibly, allowed Lenin and his comrades safe passage from Switzerland to Sweden, then on to Russia where his personal influence on the Bolshevik revolution would change the face of Slavic Europe for half a century However Lenin was the figurehead of the Bolshevik Party, he was not present during the actual takeover of the Winter Palace and it was really Trotsky's organization and direction that led and guided the peoples revolution. That said it was Lenin that instigated the means by which his party finally toppled Tsarist power entrenched in Russia. Not only did this alter the very structure of Russian control over its own people but in doing so, he severed the link with all the major royal houses of Europe having engaged in a monumental squabble between cousins and extended family, the Tsar had sided with the United Kingdom in opposition to the Kaiser another marital cousin in the greatest global conflagration of that time. Prior to this family dispute, Communist aspirations were temporarily frustrated by the fact that Trotsky had been exiled and hounded from one country to another and following a short time in Spain he moved to the United States where he received news from home causing him to begin his journey homeward, and did so via Canada. The great ally of democracy and Imperial member of the old Empire, Canada was complicit in allowing this essential figure to return to his ‘motherland,’ and this single act caused a major redeployment of armed forces no longer required to defend the Fatherland on the eastern front.

Effectively allowing free movement of these essential leading figures makes this nation complicit in the birth of a movement that in the very early stage of development was to take the great continent of Russia out of the Great War and allow the Germans to transfer large military forces from the Eastern Front to the west against European allies and inflicting increased loss and sacrifice. Further ramifications was the birth and growth of one of the most benign superpowers to burst onto the world arena following the second phase of this grotesque crime against humanity and Communism flexed its muscles exploding far afield with gusto. Exhausted and fatigued to a point nearing total collapse Imperial Germany sued for peace when recognising the massive manpower injected by the American nation had upon the war but how fortunate were the newest allies in having an investment in both sides engaged in the conflict? The American Army inserted tens of thousands of men to partake in just one major battle but the greatest asset was in proving the futility of the Imperial German Army fighting on against such vast, innumerable and fresh opponents. The carnage and slaughter that ensued through the four years of war were unprecedented with casualty figures for the British Army, including the Territorial Force, were issued on 10 March 1921. The losses for the period between 4 August 1914, and 30 September 1919, included 573,507 "killed in action, died from wounds and died of other causes" and 254,176 missing (minus 154,308 released prisoners), presenting a recorded total of 673,375 dead and missing. Casualty figures also indicated that there were 1,643,469 wounded and that makes no account of other nationality casualties estimated to be a total of some thirty seven million casualties, a loss that was further compounded by the Spanish flu pandemic of 1918-19 which claimed the lives in excess of forty million souls. As for the economic cost, we tend to measure this upon cessation of hostilities where restitution imposed upon the Germans of 22 billion was finally paid off in November 2012, whereas England had repaid its loans just a few years earlier of a mere 850 million. In human cost the passion for defending ones country suffered a crippling blow, which at this early time measured only slightly against the realisation of financial subservience that would influence, control and direct national aspirations from that time forward.

Probably the strangest coincidence of all, if you believe in such things, are the names, titles and loyalties of the negotiating officers appointed to sort out acceptable terms on behalf of capitulation in the Versailles Treaty at the end of hostilities. The principle governance for the allied nations was administered by Paul Warburg, a partner in the firm of Kuhn, Loeb and Co, who by pure chance had also been a major financier behind the Russian Revolution, as well as being instrumental in the founding of the U.S. Federal Reserve system in 1913. His appointment was most fortuitous as his opposing negotiator, representing the interests of Imperial Germany happened to be his brother Max, who was a partner in the Hamburg branch of the finance/lending house. In terms of land mass, the war caused the dissolution of four major Empires; Germany lost its colonial empire, Czechoslovakia, Finland, Latvia, Estonia, plus Poland gained its independence and the kingdom of Yugoslavia replaced the generic lands of Serbia, but, these confiscations would fuel existent resentment and spur cessation by force viewed by the antagonists as perfectly justifiable in recompense for cessation after Versailles in 1919.

Peace in this instance was embraced by the continuity of the British Empire yet this success paved the way for the next phase of this carefully construed plan in which to sew seeds for its desired breakup in the course of time. The power brokers of imperial, empire building had made major progress but it remained to be soon whether their patience would prevail through to the next phase of their hidden agenda. In the meantime the fertile soil of Europe had been turned to a quagmire and peoples of Europe decimated, the Versailles 'Peace' Conference was convened near Paris, in 1919. Reparations were imposed upon the post-war German government and Weimar Republic that were so crippling and unsustainable that opposition and rejection would inevitably prepare the ground (on purpose or by design?) for German national revival. Albeit a deep sense of betrayal felt by serving soldiers declined and presented itself by the rapid growth of both extremes of politics in search of the restoration of national pride, a decent standard of living or individual dignity. Essentially repercussions firmly linked to the Treaty of Versailles set the precedent for the next great European conflict even before the corpse of Europe’s soil was cleansed.

Meantime industry had boomed in the United States during war years and the vast mechanical expansion was now redundant, expensive and almost valueless. Homebound loans to expand and support the industrial boom were now called in. Lending houses secured monopolies by repossession and still retained fiscal control that by design and purpose should have been offset and compensated for by the Federal Reserve, now absent and dormant. This facilitated further buy outs by financial houses to acquire a wide variety of enterprises, ranging from Woolworths to speculative land values. In effect the years following the Great War attained notoriety during the Wall Street crash and the great depression as a period of perpetual power struggles for industrial and financial control that is excellently presented to the reader in A.K.Chestertons book, 'The New Unhappy Lords'. I in the meantime aim these words trying to reveal deceptions and misrepresentation by established friends, foes, allies and political opponents. After all the greatest lie this nation has paid lip service to is the 'special relationship' with a nation that has consistently and deliberately worked in opposition to our interests whilst covertly destroying all that we have held as precious and dear to heart.

The lateness of the United States entry into the First World War was received with placid derision and mockery in the United Kingdom but its people could hardly feel sympathy for a nation that pondered so long upon its loyalty for the enemy in this conflict having so many of its citizens of Germanic extraction, plus a significant number having Irish Republican sympathies. From the American perspective there remained an inherent, dormant resentment that had never waned, sometimes even nurtured since 1812 and the War of Independence. This concern caused some senior naval officers from each country to consider the other as a potential future threat, while others favoured a close alliance between the English-speaking powers over the passage of time, of which the later, on the surface would prevail. Meantime drastically opposing opinions raged in the years leading up to 1917 with William Simms bearing a deep respect for the Royal Navy striving to consolidate it through an alliance with the Mother country, whilst William S. Benson festered a deep rooted dislike for Britain and maintained his opinion that both nations were rivals and potential enemies. Further deep rooted opposition to the English cause was manifest at the highest and most ambitious levels of American expansionism recognising the United Kingdom enjoyed a unique influence over its Empire across the globe and possessed a truly global power-base, enjoying access to absolutely massive resources. The question of opposition or obstruction to further US expansion must have been greatly elevated by the knowledge of the massive fiscal debt to which England was now beholden. Astute business practice was far less significant concerning financial obligation and repayment was cursory in comparison to massive financial liability and the potential to persuade and cajole alternative assets or favours in kind. Far more than national growth through industrial expansion the power brokers recognised the potential that was open due to the provision of both the goods of war along with the finances upon which to wage it. This carefully calculated opportunity would leave the United Kingdom massively indebted to US finance houses where the threat of closure would be brought to bear imposing substantial influence upon policy, both national and global, plus government and fiscal dependence infinitum.

Profiteering through the Great War years seems an extreme expression of what might naively consider being willing help and aid but it had the distinct opportunity to covertly impose influence over foreign policy for decades. Such influence remains literally invisible but its potential to influence would in the course of time manifest into the very destruction of the British Empire as a power-base and recognised as being a viable and even essential step toward American expansionism. This covertly aggressive attitude was accompanied by an almost paranoid sequence of events causing America to draw up comprehensive plans to defend and attack England, plus in defence of US sanity! including Mexico, Japan, Australia and New Zealand and even if need arose to contain a domestic uprising from within. These plans would be identified by colour coding and England enjoyed the use of the colour red, which for so many years was the colour identifying nations under its influence over the far reaches of Britain’s empire across the globe.

American expansionism was not the aspiration of the average citizen, far from it, but not so the power base of industry and finance houses of Wall Street. Such influence and localised control was barely constrained by the limitation of primitive communications in the world of the twenties and thirties, none the less such limitation would require addressing pursuing the ambitions of an expanding empire. More traditional means of imposition looked to foreign climes in which to secure calculated growth. Whereby it could not be ignored that England, perhaps more than any other nation cast its shadow over major land-masses of the globe and enjoyed a privileged position founded upon centuries of exploration, expansion and capitalising on natural wealth, even to our shame that of human trafficking. As inconceivable as it might be and with poverty rife, industry constrained and a people screaming for deliverance one mighty influence was deemed a realistic means of revival in America and the High Command as the US military evolved proposals aimed specifically at declaring war on the United Kingdom and launch an attack from the mainland of America upon the neighbouring land mass of Canada. This concept was known as 'War Plan Red' and designed to eliminate all British forces along the northern hemisphere, whilst the US navy blockaded the North Atlantic, thus denying transport of any relief forces as well as suffocating Britain's trading ability and forcing the country to its knees.

Construction of military installations actually occurred and included air bases along with enclosed areas in which to contain captive forces. Unparalleled troop movements actually occurred in 1930 as a precursor to invasion, meantime plans were afoot to launch massive bombing raids on key industrial targets. Even the use of chemical weapons was authorised at the highest level by none other than General Douglas MacArthur and whilst plans were being prepared to implement this, the US. media fostered animosity in the American population surreptitiously during the depression, highlighting the fact that the UK had such massive war loans outstanding with the U.S. and the extent of this hostility was revealed in a channel 5 TV programme screened in 2012. It was President Franklin D. Roosevelt who succumbed to advisers planning what would have been an apocalyptic war with England and its dominions, but fortunately he was privy to another plan of action that would come to pass with a little help from his friends over the following decade and that alternative was perceived by witnessing home-grown Nazi sympathisers marching down New York's Park Avenue to converge on a pro-Hitler rally in Madison Square Garden.

Glancing across the ocean the power brokers recognised the first transition of change in Communist Russia was now firmly entrenched. Whereby there existed a potential for further orchestration of change manifesting in central Europe and with careful management, could be steered in a beneficiary direction that was not solely dependent upon anti British feelings alone. This resulted in the implementation of more practical measures initiated by several prominent US politicians and financiers who injected substantial capital to support the new and blossoming National Socialists in Germany, of whome, two of the more prominent names include Grandfather Kennedy and Bush, the former being an avid supporter of Irish republicanism. Another influential and wealthy racist and anti-Semite was Henry Ford. Who nurtured a close collaboration with the Nazis even through to the first years of the 39-45 war. Thus as unbelievable as these facts may seem, they bear no comparison to the diabolic intent and implementation that would evolve centred around unseen controllers of nations and human populations soon to be unleashed.

Dec 22, '13
No Comments Available
Raven Echo © 2010 - 2021
Founded by Ian Ballie PHD
Designed by Jay Graham