Time of Greathttp://www.ravenecho.com/static/161/b8db2c6eb7bb576c690a4971e62e0d6e.jpg
In the early part of the 21st Century, those that live have relatives in memory that lived these events.
If you are of an age that holds pride and respect in the generations before us, namely our parents, grandparents and great grandparents, who were to survive and prevail with great fortitude and courage through two global wars that engulfed whole generations and decimated them for reasons best thought of at the time but now confusing in the light of peacetime victory. But â€“ above all, have no delusions or cast no doubt upon the sense of achievement they and service personnel of today who believe they fight to preserve democracy and our way of life. It now falls upon us to make sure their sacrifice is not in vain and that personal freedom democracy prevails.
That said, of all that mankind can endure or inflict upon himself, conflict takes an ugly precedence over all else. Motivation or reason accompany controversial facts linked to national boundaries and areas of influence but above all, precipitate a new and almost invisible method of domination that would enslave mankind without them even knowing it.
This grand design required a radical redrawing of national boundary maps of Europe and Asia, that would not just alter borders, but also snare the inhabitants into a vipers nest of perpetual debt and subservience and the cost to humanity, regardless of race, colour or religion was superfluous.
At the turn of the twentieth century personal ambition fuelled by national pride had run hard and fast to keep pace and supersede expansion of religion and doctrinal power over mans thoughts and belief systems. National boundaries had segmented the world into power bases of inter dependence. In compensation for the solitude of one racial group or another, nations created allegiances that closeted themselves in the exaggerated belief of strength in numbers.
Ambitious as it was the aim was to start with the so called Great War which stole its grand title from the years of Napoleonic ambition. At the very outset it served to quench the growing problem of dissension of the lower classes and female emancipation whilst inflicting the first significant phase of deliberate population reduction.
The jingoism of patriotism was drowned out by the outrage propagated by the assassination of the Arch Duke Ferdinand by a Serbian national. The fact that he was Jewish would only lend fuel to the fire of the maelstrom, that was still on the distant horizon. Central European powers formed alliances between Germany, Austria-Hungary, Bulgaria (joined in 1915) and the Ottoman Empire. Whereby Allied Powers- included the United Kingdom, France, Russia, Serbia, to a much lesser degree, Japan and the United States (joined in 1917) but their involvement was far more significant in extending the global interest, whilst implanting itself on foreign soil to extend the power base still under construction.
Carnage in Europe was not enough to engage the American people in this distant European war. However Secretary of State William Jennings Bryan anticipated, that large banking interests were deeply interested in the World War because of wide opportunities for large profits. This realization would supersede President Wilsonâ€™s' 'keeping us out of the war' mandate given to secure his place in office in 1916.
The French firm of Rothschild Freres cabled to Morgan and Company in New York requesting the flotation of a loan of $100,000,000, of which a substantial part was to be left in the U.S., to pay for French purchases of American goods and this first recorded war loan set the president for the future and the dye was cast.
Slaughter ensued on an unprecedented scale and American inclusion was acknowledged to insert a major military level that would transform the outcome. None the less the greater portion of United States citizens had their family roots in Europe and some were to rally back to their respective flags at the call to arms, but on the whole, the people of America were fully behind separatism and quite happy to let Europe fight its own war.
Altering this attitude would require an event of some magnitude that would enrage the American public and stir them into action. With such thought in mind an event was to take place, that was assumed would fill that role admirably but at the outset and to the planners great surprise this crime against humanity was simply not harsh enough.
At first a somewhat innocuous action went into place as the owner of the Cunard Lines turned a ship over to the First Lord of The Admiralty, Winston Churchill. This vessel therefore became a ship of the British Navy under the control of the British Government. Quite naturally one might think it was despatched to New York and loaded with six million rounds of ammunition destined for French and English armed forces to aid their war against Germany. This major acquisition of munitions was of prime importance, yet German intelligence detected this plan, furthermore at the end of January 1914 British Intelligence had broken German codes and were subsequently informing the admiralty when and in which zone of operations U- Boats were operating in.
Regardless of how insane, obscene even grotesque the slaughter was on mainland Europe there was a quirky code of conduct still in existence between the Knights of the Sky and certain naval vessels, whereby U-Boat captains would signal a chosen enemy vessel he intended to sink and allow the crew to abandon ship. However if the nature of the vessel made this impracticable an alternative was to place advertisement of their intent in the cities newspapers distributed in adjoining harbours and docklands, and this was the case in New York in the months leading up to May 1915.
That advertisement warned potential passengers they were sailing into a war zone and liable to attack, which was as near as dammit advance warning of intent. To further supplement this advice, a senate advisor upon receiving advance warning promised â€œ he would endeavour to persuade the President (Woodrowe Wilson) to warn American citizens to not sail on this particular vessel as its cargo was well known to himâ€, but the President simply ignored this advice!
As planned the ocean liner set sail and on May 7th, 1915, The Lusitania was duly sunk off the coast of County Cork by a U Boat after it had slowed to await the arrival of a Royal Navy escort vessel HMS. Juno, but for reasons best known to himself Winston Churchill ordered HMS Juno to return to port leaving the Lusitania to its fate and 1201 people lost their lives. This attack took place even though the First Lord of The Admiralty had been advised that three U Boats were in the direct vicinity of the liner. Meanwhile the Naval vessel formerly assigned to the 11th cruiser Squadron operating from Ireland was mysteriously sent to serve in the Persian Gulf.
It was even made public in the book 'The Intimate Papers of Colonel House' that conversation between Colonel House and Sir Edward Grey, the Foreign Secretary of England, where a question was posed,
â€œ What would the Americans do if the Germans sink an ocean liner with American passengers on board?â€
Where the reply came,
â€œ I believe that a flame of indignation would sweep the United States and that by itself would be sufficient to carry us into the warâ€ and it was proclaimed as â€œthe foulest act of wilful murder ever committed on the seasâ€ but who was guilty of premeditating that crime?
Further publication included the Los Angeles Times that reviewed Colin Simpsonâ€™s book and concluded: "The LusitaniaÂ proves beyond a reasonable doubt that the British government connived at the sinking of the passenger ship in order to lure America into World War I. The Germans, whose torpedo struck the liner, were the unwitting accomplices or victims of a plot probably concocted by Winston Churchill."
Contrary to political intrigue, this single act was not enough to cause national indignation as anticipated, no more were the sinking of four more American vessels over the following years. News of an event far closer to home might well affront the people of the United States, and this occurred with an alleged intercepted telegram, decoded by British cryptographers of Room 40.instructing Ambassador Eckardt that
'If it appeared as if the United States were going to enter the war, he was to approach the Mexican government with a proposal for an alliance that would lend German help in Mexico reclaiming the American previously disputed states of Texas, New Mexico and Arizona.â€
The mere suggestion exaggerated with much hype through national media evoked a backlash that would allow President Wilson to make the long awaited declaration against Imperial Germany without opposition.
It was April 6th 1917 and of course this declaration came as a great relief to the orchestratorâ€™s of massive war loans. The U.S. had huge economic investments with the British and French and if they were to lose, this would prove an unacceptable loss (amounting to about two billion dollars while Germany only borrowed a mere 27 million). Furthermore, France and England were financing their war with US loans by securing massive amounts of arms and ordinance from the US on credit. Regardless of any other considerations the US wanted to make sure it got paid back.. Therefore, America fighting alongside their allies was not only a moral duty but also an economic obligation.
How fortunate were they to have major financial investment in both sides engaged in the conflict? The American Army inserted tens of thousands of men to partake in just one major battle but at least prove the futility of the Imperial German Army fighting on against such vast, innumerable and unweary odds.
There does however remain one mere aside to the strange goings on during The First World War and how fortuitous and an interesting twist in the chess game of global politics when German authorities allowed Lenin and his comrades safe passage by train from Switzerland to Sweden during the peak of hostilities and subsequently Russia where his influence on the Bolsheviks revolution changed the face of Slavic Europe. As anticipated by German High Command the result was Russia extracting itself from the costly war, permitting the transfer of large military forces from the Eastern Front to the west against European allies inflicting further loss and sacrifice.
Further ramifications was the birth and growth of one of the most malevolent superpowers that preceded the second phase of this grotesque crime against humanity.
A Time to Breath.
Reflection and human cost was but a small part of the true cost of global war.
Casualties in World War One are estimated at 37 million soon after followed by Spanish flu of 1918-19 which claimed lives in excess of forty million souls. As for the economic cost, that was mere 22 billion imposed upon Germany in restitution being finally paid off in November 2012, whereby England had repaid its loans just a few years earlier of a mere 850 million. Freedom in Europe was accompanied by financial subservience that would steer and direct national aspirations into the indefinite future.
Probably the strangest coincidence of all, if you should believe in such things are the names, titles and loyalties of the negotiating officers appointed to sort out acceptable terms of surrender in the Versailles Treaty at the end of hostilities. For the victors the principle governance was administered by Paul Warburg, a partner in the firm of Kuhn, Loeb and Co, who by chance had also been a major financier behind the Russian Revolution and founding of the U.S.Federal Reserve system in 1913. Overseeing the terms and conditions was most fortuitous as his opposing negotiator for the defeated Germans happened to be his brother Max, a partner in the Hamburg lending house. In terms of land mass, the war caused the dissolution of four major Empires; Germany lost its colonial empire, Czechoslovakia, Finland, Latvia, Estonia and Poland gained its independence and the kingdom of Yugoslavia replaced the generic lands of Serbia.
The Versailles 'Peace' Conference, was convened near Paris, in 1919. Reparations were imposed upon the post-war German government and the Weimar Republic, that were so crippling and unsustainable that inevitable opposition and rejection would prepare the ground â€” (on purpose?) â€” for German revival and restoration of national pride. Essentially repercussions firmly linked to the Treaty of Versailles set the precedent for the next great European conflict even before the corpse of Europeâ€™s soil was cleansed.
Extreme politics both left and right wing were no more than desperate means of expression centred around frustration and resentment. Human frailty coerced by redirected blame upon minority groups was ably fed during the slump and depression of a frustrated and resentful populace. Racial intolerance raised its ugly head - and - maybe this extract from a famous oratory may serve to indicate its significance;
â€œThis world-wide conspiracy for the overthrow of civilisation and for the reconstitution of a society on the basis of arrested development, of envious malevolence and impossible equality, has been steadily growing. There is no need to exaggerate the part played in the creation of Bolshevism and in the actual bringing about of the Russian revolution by these international and for the most part atheistically Jews. It is certainly a very great one; it probably outweighs all others. With the notable exception of Lenin the majority of leading figures are Jews. Moreover, the principal inspiration and driving power comes from the Jewish leadersâ€.
Shocking; maybe? Politically incorrect; yes! Its origin? Not Goebels, nor Hitler, but a famous leader much closer to home who was to lead this nation through its darkest hour. None other than Sir Winston Churchill!
Furthermore in 1920 Churchill recognized the connection between the Illuminati and the Bolshevik Revolution in Russia and observes:
â€œFrom the days of Spartacus-Weishaupt to those of Karl Marx, to those of Trotsky, Bela Kun, Rosa Luxembourg, and Emma Goldman, this world wide conspiracy for the overthrow of civilization and for the reconstitution of society on the basis of arrested development, of envious malevolence and impossible equality, has been steadily growing. It played a definitely recognizable role in the tragedy of the French Revolution. It has been the mainspring of every subversive movement during the nineteenth century, and now at last this band of extraordinary personalities from the underworld of the great cities of Europe and America has gripped the Russian people by the hair of their heads, and has become practically the undisputed masters of that enormous empire.â€ Harsh even damning words from a man who became a legend in his own lifetime.
Poverty reigned supreme and a massive slump and depression ensued. National governments failed to deliver on the 'land fit for heroes' promises. The Great War that had almost cost a whole generation their lives, left children Fatherless, wives husband-less, and Mothers childless and the wheels of industry began to rust in operatively.
Whilst in America the land that should have profited from the increased production in World War One suffered massively during the deep recession .The Federal Reserve Bank contrived to respond to such national emergencies was strangely absent from the market place, yet funding seemed readily available to secure major take-overs of business, companies and industries. The real power-base of governance was not subservient to the masters of finance but the nurturers.
Poverty reached the harshest of extremes during this period. Normal established politics was clearly failing and the human mind, bereft of normal life requirements could always allay blame upon weaker racial groups or other nations demands and influences for their woes and losses. Political rhetoric gave way to extremist rantings and as loud and confident as rally calls were, it still seemed inconceivable that stable, democratic countries would scream out to men of charisma and confidence to appease and encourage the hearts and minds of the masses.
Radical views were absorbed even welcomed by great numbers of impoverished people in countries including the United States, Great Britain, Spain, Italy, Germany and even Russia in opposition to Communism. Thus, however inconceivable extreme politics are viewed in the 21st century it was simply part of everyday life and as normal as anything offered by the promise breaking, self serving regular streams of politics that we endure today.
The great continent of the United States was alarmingly aware that expansion would be constrained by Imperial Empires of European origin and envious eyes cast their gaze on England, where more than any other nation cast its shadow over major landmasses of the globe and enjoyed a privileged position founded on exploration, expansion, trade and capitalising on natural wealth, even to our shame that of human trafficking.
As unimaginable as it might now seem during a time of acute poverty, one option was conceived that would spur a means of revival in the United States and the High Command evolved proposals aimed specifically at declaring war on the United Kingdom that would open with an attack on Canada from the mainland of America. This concept was known as 'War Plan Red' and designed to eliminate all British forces on the land mass of Canada as well as by concerted naval action from the North Atlantic, thus destroying Britain's trading ability and bringing the country to its knees.
Unparalleled troop movements were a precursor to invasion which would have included massive bombing raids on key industrial targets. Even the use of chemical weapons were authorised at the highest level by none other than General Douglas MacArthur. Animosity by American civilians in the height of a soul destroying depression extended to the fact that the UK had such massive war loans outstanding with the U.S., and the sheer extent of this hostility was revealed in a channel 5 TV programme which is available for individual viewing on computer search engines.
It was President Franklin D. Roosevelt who subscribed to what would have been an apocalyptic war with England and its dominions, but fortunately he was privy to another plan of action that would come to pass with a little help from his friends over the following decade and that alternative was perceived by witnessing home-grown Nazi sympathisers marching down New York's Park Avenue to converge on a pro-Hitler rally in Madison Square Garden.
The ground was fertile for political extremes to flourish with depression as the harsh master of despair. Right or left wing ideology flourished in their own way offering a utopia unable oft unwilling to recognise the similarities of respective aspirations and ideologies. Meantime Germany of the late twenties and early thirties was host to the second strongest Communist party in the world, and not without cause a backlash was all but inevitable. When it came it swept the Fatherland with ruthless abandon.
Inevitability or design?
Nothing is ever just black or white even photography.
Hitlerâ€™s meteoric rise to power was strongly assisted by the injection of capital from some fairly surprising sources such as the Rothschild controlled Harridan Empire through a company called the Union Banking Corporation (UBC) Virtually all trade between the Nazi's and the United States was under the control of Harriman interests and the stewardship of people like Prescott Bush. (George Bush's grandfather) The Bank also interfaced with the steel and banking empire of Hitler funder, Fritz Thyssen.
The Bushâ€”Nazi connection was highlighted by John Loftus, president of the Florida Holocaust Museum, who pointed out that Prescott Bush derived a portion of his personal fortune from his affiliation with the UBC. Loftus, had been a prosecutor in the Justice Department's Nazi War Crimes Unit, and declared that leading Nazi industrialists secretly owned the 'Harriman/Bush' bank and that they were moving money into the UBC through a second bank in Holland even after the United States declared war on Germany. The bank went into liquidation in 1951, upon which Loftus said, 'President Boy Bush's grandfather and great grandfather, Herbert Walker, received $1.5 million as part of that dissolution.'
The Bush family fortune came from: the Third Reich', Loftus announced in a speech during the Sarasota Reading Festival in 2001. He also asserted that the Rothschild-controlled Rockefeller family funded the work of Ernst Rudin, Hitler's foremost 'racial hygienist', at Germany's Kaiser Wilhelm Institute for Eugenics, Anthropology and Human Heredity. Other Nazi doctors, including 'Angel of Death' Josef Mengele, conducted incredibly cruel and vicious experiments on live, captive human subjects under the closeted umbrella of this seditious institute.
Considering how the Nazi's were to persecute the Jews during their reign indicates the complete absence of care or concern on the part of Zionist moneymakers for the Jewish people. But trade and commerce rule the roost and where Germany's exports were essential to other nations, in particular southern America, trade continued unabated, with financial transactions being conveyed covertly by the HSB.
Another danger inherent in the policy of the Third Reich was in negotiating required goods be exchanged between nations with neither party having to resort to international lending houses to finance the deal. Instead, the exchange should take place on a "swap" basis. No great insight is needed to perceive that the success of this system of barter, if employed on a world scale would mean for most practical purposes the end of international finance and of the immense power it confers upon its operators.
As though this were not offence enough in the eyes of the international lending houses, the Third Reich set to work sedulously to repay its external debt and thereby regain control over its own economic destiny. Furthermore Hitlerâ€™s audacity in revaluing his own national currency and calling it the Reich Mark was the
true beginning of his end. In contravening the International Monetary Fund control restrictions he ensured that the value of currency exchange imposed by Wall Street would not control prices within the boundaries of his own national and international marketplace, his fate was therefore sealed.
He also revolutionised the attitude and aspirations of his national work force, motivating it far beyond the constraint of union control in a willing and eager German nation. Basic working hours took second place to a sense of achievement, self respect and national pride . Conditions of employment increased experientially, paid holidays meant just that, paid to be on holiday and a holiday paid for in one of the fast growing holiday and leisure resorts created by National Socialism. People wanted to work and industry grew at an unprecedented rate.
International finance could never tolerate Germans' fiercely independent nationalism and this was further reinforced by defiantly recovering the Rhineland from the French, who had occupied it after the Great War, which set about implementing a centrepiece of industrial revival unequalled anywhere in the world at that time.
To preserve democracy.
The second phase of the Global war our grandparents endured.
Having revolutionised German industry, albeit aimed at war production, Hitlerâ€™s aggressive need for expansion and annexation of European territories had largely been constrained to German territories confiscated at the Versailles Treaty. Thus with a clear aim to reinstate those out reaching colonies to their former status he was clearly in contravention of opposing interests both globally as well as European.
Twentieth century history books and lessons delivered across the nation tell our children we had a pact with Poland and when the Germans attacked them unprovoked we were legally bound to go to their defence. That is not true; France had undertaken to defend Poland and our commitment was to France even though they reluctantly declared war on Germany some hours after hostility had started.
We in essence were in default, yet why did our declaration in aid of Polandâ€™s independence not include the fact that Russian military forces had also invaded Polish sovereign soil? Why were they allowed cart-blanche to carve up a country our citizens had been told was the reason why we were engaged in another European war? Why then is it that we did not declare war on Russia as well as Germany? They had a non aggression pact with Germany, but so did Italy and Spain. Russian Communist expansionism took its first heavy booted steps, at the same time the western world screamed liberty and democracy across the airwaves of Europe, albeit strangely selective.
Pretence of preserving Polandâ€™s independence was not enough and the declaration of war by Great Britain was thus gratuitous. James Forrestal, U.S. Secretary of the Navy, states in his Diaries that the American Ambassador in London told him Neville Chamberlain had complained of Jewish pressures to force Britain into war. Those pressures were obviously exerted with decisive effect through the Churchill-Israel Moses Sieff group.
The war itself a bestial, savage beyond all reason, violent and emotionally devastating affair tested all normal human perceptions. Human emotions are challenged to the full, abject fear preceding engagement of battle, yet sounds of pain, loss and suffering, sound of tears and absolute and total shame seem grossly insufficient to deter such inhuman action. Countless books relate to heroism, bravery, tenacity and sheer willpower. Numerous songs and sonnets resound of death and suffering, whilst teasing individual memories etched forever into the minds of those that saw and witnessed the horrors!
How on earth can the hard face of written words ever relay to the reader the extremity of all sensations and feelings, what ever else could ever come close to the test enforced upon the human spirit and soul? What songs of protest will ever echo longer than the songs of remembrance and respect? Where fits temperance and mutual understanding that accompanies the memory of reason and purpose so bitterly betrayed by death and destruction?
But above all, where lies the measure of gain to human kind and what profit, what freedom?
Progress of warlike activity seems a profound contradiction of terms. Gains, successes and victories at such cost are measured only by cessation of conflict, where retribution and plain and simple revenge reign supreme. But, how does a person measure the actual gain at the end of a war, especially the victims, which includes both sexes and all ages throughout the continent of Europe and a fair degree of the Far East? Freedom, democracy and the right to live a life of choice and free will are wonderful ideals, albeit shrouded in the rubble of bomb sites and destruction of industry, farm land and reasonable living conditions? Still, ever upwards, life goes on, it can't get any worse, can it?
Reconstruction is as profitable as war, rebuilding increases employment and sense of purpose at all levels of society, development on a clean sheet offers opportunities unbounded. Political change and international inter dependence presents diversity and variety; the way forward should embrace progress and prosperity. Building a new future should encompass free trade and mutual respect as the foundation of the hopes and aspirations open to all. All that remains on a negative note, is to ascertain the cost of achieving this aim. Well, freedom was what it was all about and freedom was worth fighting for, but how do we preserve it for all time and avert the destruction and mayhem of wars? Maintaining peace would require careful management to compensate for the flaws of human frailties and - to ensure this the United States decided to assume the role of global policemen and establish satellite outposts and military facilities across the globe . British, Dutch, French and German colonies plus of course the natural wealth deep under ground in the middle east would have to be circumvented, or would they?
Freedom and its conservation had come at a massive cost but building the peace was lain upon foundations born strictly and irrevocably upon wartime conditions and circumstances. Until the two great global wars the British Empire on the whole had rallied to the cause of freedom and accepting the controversial history that accompanies the growth of that empire, albeit founded by exploration and expansion with fair impact of greed, it did, introduce whole continents to the progressive elements of the nineteenth and twentieth centuries.
Regardless, the development had an emphasis on usury and even slavery but there was nothing new in that, after all the Romans specialized in it,equally so did most cultures of the world that preceded the British Empire and contrary to 20th/21st century directives, slavery was not singularly linked to the hue of a persons skin, as such it now acts so conveniently as a tool of political correctness at the expense of historical fact.
The new emerging nation was founded upon a federation of States, a United States and its industrial might had flourished massively alongside wartime industry. Financial dominance extended its arm across the globe and supported industry and growth under a lend lease scheme, plus war loans that would take decades, if not centuries to repay. Even though this came at a great cost, the conditions of this acquiescence had ramifications of massive scale. But how and why did this happen, who gave their consent?
Unity of purpose and friendship.
Orchestrating their entry into the First World War, secretly funding National Socialism then coming to the aid of freedom and democracy was completing the circle of deceit. American imperialism began to blossom! Its industry had enjoyed a boom on lend lease policy leading the U.K. into further massive debt, monumental interest and convenient separatism but that was now in severe decline.
Thus it was no surprise the US., High Command turned a deaf ear to the information afforded it by British Intelligence on the 3rd of December 1941 informing it of the embarkation of a Japanese task force sailing meaningfully eastward toward the US naval base at Pearl Harbour. Two thousand four hundred American citizens perished at that supposed, surprise attack, and President Roosevelt proclaimed,
"A date which will live in infamy".
However, a precursor to the US declaration of war occurred at the Atlantic Charter meeting where Roosevelt hinted at the post-war elimination of "those little old Preferences of yours" whereby Churchill declared;
"Mr. President, I believe Mr President that you are trying to do away with the British Empire! Every idea you entertain of the structure of the post-war world demonstrates it".
He was, in point of fact referring to just one minor condition laid down by our glorious allies. Firstly, that we terminate all trading preferences we had with the old Empire, abort the word from our terminology and rename it the Commonwealth. That said, only a few weeks later Churchill was proclaiming himself Roosevelt's "ardent lieutenant".
As far as is known "America's" anti-British policy was first given concrete expression by General Marshall at the Quebec Conference in 1943. Whereby he noted the effect that the greatest single obstacle to the expansion of America's export-capitalism after the war would not be the Soviet Union but the British Empire. In effect as soon as the enemies in the field had been defeated, it would be the turn of the British Empire to be progressively destroyed and that this target would be the US aim even whilst hostilities raged.
That said American service personnel fought as bravely and tenaciously as the British counterparts, they died as colourfully too and without them, the war would no doubt have been lost, but then that's why they were there.
The British Empire was not the only ally marked down for liquidation. The Dutch Empire in the East Indies and the French Empire in Indo-China and Africa were also. Meanwhile Britain made minor concessions, for example, freedom of thought and independence, we became the lap dog of International Finance and effectively another unwritten state of the U. S. of A.
Meantime the United States became the richest nation in the world. Not only had they passed on to us a load of outdated semi abandoned naval vessels from the First World War, but we were contractually bound to pay for liberty ships as soon as their hull hit salt water. Bearing in mind their boast of speedy construction, revelled in the knowledge that we were still financially responsible for vessels that split in two and sank whilst steaming across the Atlantic toward beleaguered Britain.
This, along with demands of purchasing their redundant webbing no longer suitable for their own military weapons passed on to the ill-equipped Home Guard. However it is hard to see how their provision of ball bearings to another European company, called Heinkel was contributing toward democracy and freedom.
Those American ball bearings kept Heinkel bombers in flight over the skies of England for three long, beleaguered years, as well as the terror that rained from above in Spain before it. But perhaps the most foreboding or ironic twist is the financial support offered by I.G.Farben into German development factories including the production of Zyclon B. That said, the 'Death Camps' were not elevated to industrial murder units until 1942.
Closer to home, British Intelligence had long been in possession of the Nazi Enigma machine that transmitted Military messages in complex codes and used it to great success. However one time that might have saved countless lives was upon the infamous Luftwaffe air raid on Coventry that levelled both the Cathedral and the city centre at great loss of life. It was seen as expedient to ignore the advance warning and sacrifice Coventry rather than betray the advance warning they had in their possession.
Meantime nations that suffered under Nazi occupation Mikolajczyk, Prime Minister of the Polish Government in exile, when he heard rumours of the projected carving-up of his country, hastily crossed the Atlantic in search of reassurances from the American President. Of which Roosevelt had no compunction in advancing. The Poles, he said, need have no fear. At the end of the war their pre-war frontiers would be restored. With which he gave his personal guarantee.
Not too soon after Mikolajczyk attended the Moscow Conference and was amazed to find the partitioning of Poland taken for granted, with Russia confirmed in their possession of the half they had occupied in September 1939. When confronted by this betrayal Stalin wasted no time in declaring "All this was settled at Tehran". Shocked and dismayed he was unwilling to believe Roosevelt could have told him a bare-faced lie, and Mikolajczyk turned to Averell Harriman, the President's representative for reassurance. Harriman looked away, then turning to Churchill who said gravely: "That is so".
The Polish Premier declared he could not be a party to the betrayal of his country, whereby Stalin brought the session to an abrupt end. Back in the ante-room reserved for Western Allies, Churchill turned a furious eye on Mikolajczyk, told him he was endangering allied relationships and that he ought to be in a criminal lunatic asylum. There would be no difficulty about the Polish frontiers, he asserted. He would himself give orders to the British Ambassador in Warsaw to see that the pre-war frontiers were restored.
Unimpressed, the Polish Prime Minister asked to be parachuted into Warsaw so he could die fighting the enemy instead of being shot by the Russians in front of the British Ambassador. At this point, he records in his autobiography, Churchill turned unhappily away. Thus this sad glimpse of Winston Churchill surely indicated he was fully aware of the pending treachery.
The war had started in order to preserve the freedom of the Polish people yet why was it that Stalinâ€™s armed forces occupied all of Poland, Czechoslovakia, Hungary, Latvia, Lithuania, Hungary, and numerous small nations in 1945 which made up what was to become known as the Union of Soviet Socialist Russia.
So what price freedom? What was the war really all about - Polish freedom?
Friends and Allies.
To justify a global crusade against Germany.
A citizen of Poland that survived years of war would probably be hard pressed to identify which nation they held in more contempt, the Germans or the Russians, as during the Russian invasion of Poland in 1939, some 14,500 Polish officers were captured and interned in three P.O.W. camps in the Soviet Union. Radio Berlin broadcast on April 13, 1943, stating that the German Army had discovered mass graves at Katyn, containing the bodies of Polish officers. Eight graves were opened and 4,253 bodies exhumed and it was established that the bodies were of Polish officers from the camp at Kozielsk, plus two other camps, at Starobielsk (3,891 men) and at Ostashkov (6,311 men).
On April 13, 1990, fifty years after the massacre, KGB files state that 21,857 Poles were shot as a result of Stalin's orders. In other parts of the Katyn Forest, other graves were discovered containing the bodies of Russian political prisoners executed in pre-war days by the NKVD. It seems that the Katyn Forest was the main execution site for Stalinâ€™s secret police.
Soon after the German attack on the Soviet Union of 1941, retreating Soviets had no time to care for prisoners locked up in prisons in the Ukraine, so they were simply killed. In some cities the whole prisons were set on fire and the helpless prisoners burned to death. In Lutsk, 2,800 out of the 4000 inmates in the NKVD prison, were murdered.
When the German 49th Army Corps occupied the Polish-Ukrainian city of Lvov, (now Limberg) around 2,400 dead bodies were discovered by German troops in the NKVD prison. Some were killed by hand-grenades thrown into their cells, but most killed by a shot in the neck. In the cellars of the Brygidky Prison on Palczymska Street, 423 bodies were recovered.
In the military prison at Samarstinov, 460 charred bodies were found, many showing signs of brutal torture. On June 26-27, 1941, some 520 Ukrainians were shot at Sambor, and at Zlochev, another 700, including the entire local intelligentsia, were arrested and shot on July 16, 1941. At Kremenets, between 100 and 150 were killed and when the bodies were recovered some bodies were without skin, having been thrown into boiling water.
Shortly after the occupation of the town of Vinnitsa in July, 1941, German troops discovered a mass grave containing 96 Ukrainian political prisoners. Three different locations were located in a pear orchard, 2kms outside the town, 38 mass graves were found, in the old cemetery 40 graves were discovered and in the People's Park another 35 and it was soon established that the victims had died some five years before. Most of the victims were land workers (Kulaks) who were classed as 'enemies of the people' who had resisted Stalin's collectivisation policies.
In all Stalin murdered four times more people than Hitler, Pol Pot, Mao or Pinochet combined. During that same year German troops were to endure the first massacre in the town of Broniki 180 German soldiers of the 2nd and 6th Infantry Regiments and the 5th Artillery Regiment were prisoners of Red Army and summarily executed.
In the Volhynia (Volyn) area of north western Ukraine, local Ukrainian nationalists formed themselves into a resistance army, the Ukrainian Uprising Army (UPA) to fight the Nazi occupiers. Unfortunately their anger turned against the local Polish minority. (In the area lived some 346,000 Poles) In an attempt to drive all Poles out of Wolhynia and the Ukraine, in anticipation of an independent Ukrainian state after the war, the UPA started a war of ethnic cleansing that was to prove disastrous for both populations.
The UPA marched from village to village and killed all civilians of Polish nationality. Some 167 towns and villages were entered in this orgy of slaughter. In the village of Poryck, 157 Polish civilians were shot while attending mass in the local Catholic church. These massacres continued for a year in the rural areas until all Polish residents were either killed or expelled from their homes. These ethnic massacres were completely ignored by the German occupation forces. The exact number of Poles murdered remains unknown but is estimated by a number of historians to be in the region of 35 to 60 thousand.
But joy of joys, it wasn't all one sided as in this ethnic cleansing period around 20,000 Ukrainians were killed by Poles. War crimes against the people of Poland is just a hint of the suffering imposed by Stalinâ€™s regime, plus of course having murdered eleven million of his own people. Plus of course this account makes no reference to German inflicted atrocities. Information collated from George Duncanâ€™s book â€˜Lesser known facts of World War Twoâ€™. Nor can it be excused against the knowledge of Hitlerâ€™s Concentration Camps; that knowledge at that time was undiscovered.
Did colonization really deserve loyalty?
As the 20th century drew to an end and the new millennium started amidst numerous calls to stop immigration for a multitude of well founded reasons. None the less we opened our borders due to EU directives whilst political parties identified racism and skin colour as the base reason for so called extremist views. Common sense, over crowding and infra structure under siege never entered the vocabulary. But; are we indebted to our former Empire, or current Commonwealth and what precedence should they enjoy over the free transit of European citizens? There lies a complex question!
It certainly can't be denied the British Empire comprised of a massive majority of peoples with different skin hues. With many particularly India, having a long and distinguished history of military service for, and against, the crown of England. Yet that term 'against' deserves further explanation, plus of course, we were no better than invaders, so is resentment and a wish for independence so very surprising, after all, as far back as the Romans this nation sought the same rights and freedoms.
But first let us affirm that the continent of India was pre-occupied with independence through passive revolt led by Gandhi that won independence opposed to violent revolt that preceded it. It is therefore not too surprising to anticipate a complex story of how and when that continent achieved its independence, and how it responded to the global challenge posed by Nazi Germany and Imperial Japan to both democracy and personal freedom. So, what choices did the people of India have?
Japanâ€™s quest for dominance in the Far East was a direct challenge to the regional countries that were part of the British Empire. Whereby Germany posed a direct threat to Great Britain the arch oppressor of the Indian continent. Would, or should the Indian citizen show loyalty to the Mother country or that which poses a serious threat in deposing it. Such a dilemma faced a great many Indian nationals when acknowledging the new threat to their continent and deciding which was the best of two evils? And the truth is, nationals of India actually fought for or with all three options (Japan, Germany and England) against foes for ideological reasons only the volunteers themselves can know.
That decision, at the cessation of hostilities would have massively different ramifications on the individual choices and allegiances, in particular the recognition of service rendered by their own national government. Military service that was volunteered to invading Imperial Japanese forces were rewarded with state pensions. Whereas men who fought to maintain freedom from Japanese rule and retain the status quo with Great Britain for some reason do not warrant pension payment. Loyal Indians to their own ruling government and to Great Britain, fought against the Naziâ€™s but pensions are measured lower and unequal to their British counterparts, whereas Indians who fought for the Naziâ€™s on the Eastern Front seem to have vanished into obscurity and pension rights are unknown to me.
Indian soldiers serving in the Wermacht.
On a wider note Japanâ€™s impact upon smaller continents in the Far East such as Burma and Malaya at very least showed them that independence was within their grasp and when invading troops were expelled from their shores, they would hardly welcome the insurgence of new forces albeit the more traditional policing of the British Empire.
Back in Europe, every country that had been invaded and occupied by the Germans provided varying numbers of volunteer troops in the quest against Communism and in effect, Communism's reputation is hardly glowing any more than that of the Nazi's. Yet in 1943 the Nazi's chaired a meeting that became known as the 'Frankfurt Commission which was later to enjoy a name change to the of the European Economic Community/ It was a time of extremes and desperation, it was time when choices were more acute to fit the times in which they were set. Of course friendships were forged in the most awful of experiences, after all, look at us and the United States
Extermination, inhuman insanity.
The right time in the wrong place.
It remains conveniently ignored that Germany expelled many Jews prior to 1939 but country after country rejected them, including the UK as well as the U.S. An attempt was even made to transport them to Palestine but that too was rejected out of hand. In essence the New World Order knew the average Jew had a role to play in their long term plan and to their eternal sorrow that role was fulfilled.
It seems utterly inconceivable that Zionism, being best part Jewish could wantonly sacrifice their own people in the death camps, but the truth is, the rank and file Jew is as irrelevant to them as the gentiles or goyim (goys or the modern slang word guys). Which incidentally means sub humans. In effect the holocaust advanced the Zionist cause more than other other aspect gaining a foothold in the Middle East secured by the Balfour Treaty of 1948.
Indignation and shock regarding mass graves and atrocities conducted by Nazi Germany, only arose after three years of war. But before that, before the public knowledge of death camps was revealed, there prevailed in Germany a poverty of all the essential services required to sustain human life. We completely destroyed the nations ability to provide for itself with basic amenities of food, health, and welfare and its people suffered deprivation unknown since medieval times. Is it really so strange that if they could not feed themselves, they would not feed others?
There does however, exist holocaust deniers of which I am not one, I do however clarify that the six million included Gypsyâ€™s, disabled, mentally ill and other individuals unacceptable to the National Socialist ideology. All of which does nothing to diminish the magnitude of the crime against humanity. However, give some thought to another fact that came out of that war. Jewish genocide began upon the orders of a deranged lunatic that presided over the slow and painful destruction of his own country â€˜Germanyâ€™. Yet would we be so bold as to confirm the sanity of Roosevelt in discussion with â€˜uncleâ€™ Joe Stalin when discussing the calculated murder of 50,000 German officers, over a dinner conference so evil in content, it caused Churchill to storm from the building, refusing to have any part of their demonic intentions that proved only too true at the end of European hostilities.
Such inhumanity further fuelled by Eisenhowerâ€™s regular declaration of his hatred of anything German, including eighty year old men and six year old children, all constrained in poorly created P.O.W. compounds holding hundreds of thousands of crippled, paraplegic, emaciated and starving ex service personnel that had surrendered to allied forces during 1944/45, plus a considerable number of civilians.
Deliberate policy of ill treatment of internees during this time, resulted in the fact that more German service personnel perished in Prisoner of War camps in the year following the end of the war than those killed during all the years of hostilities in the European theatre since 1940. Can the reader really acknowledge the gravity of that fact so easily proven on the internet.
Two million are estimated to have perished due to maltreatment, with one million recorded between the peacetime year of 1945 and 1946, with a further 167,000 German P.O.W.â€™s perishing due to ill treatment in France between 1945 and 1948. And when the sheer magnitude of this heinous crime became known, American P.O.W. figures and statistics simply disappeared in a vain attempt to conceal the horror. Revenge killings too have been registered to the number of 2.1 million following the end of hostilities against German civilians that had been residents in particular of Eastern European countries. As for survivors of Russian captivity that magnifies the statistics massively, ignoring the rape, murder and pillage that was normalized as far as they were concerned during their occupation.
Jews were not the only victim of genocide, as evidence slowly emerges prominent allied commanders engaged that same attitude toward Germans regardless of age, gender of even had they ever been in military service. So which empire building nation bears the most guilt? The crime conducted against the German people is not far short of the crime that they had been accused of; it was equally calculated and equally deliberate.
Of course the first victim of war is the truth, especially when conveyed by the victor, but these statistics hardly support the hysteric justification that the war was due to the Concentration Camps, however obscene they actually were.
However the creation of deliberate internment camps as a matter of national policy might well be questioned by the fact that across the whole of the United States there have been created over sixteen hundred such camps and their purpose although a mystery, is none the less ominous.
(Information collated from George Duncanâ€™s book â€˜Lesser known facts of World War Twoâ€™ & James Bacqueâ€™s book â€˜Other lossesâ€™.)
A great deal to be thankful for?
Of course war is accepted as the Father of invention, after all, where would we be without jet aircraft? Would there be a space programme? How would we survive without the dubious power of nuclear fusion and would we now be in a Common Market? Plus of course medication and care for human kind were tested to the paramount and its legacy abides in our medicine cabinets to this day.
Administering care and medication was to reach a zenith in the early 21st century but its roots were much earlier. The common good was seen as sufficient reason to inject such chemicals as sodium chloride into national water supplies, albeit previous motivation implemented by the Nazi's was selective sterilization. The Communist too shared similar choices in discussions that preceded the mutual, invasion of Poland in 1939.
On October 2nd 1954: Charles Perkins, a chemist, wrote the following to the Lee Foundation for Nutritional Research, Milwaukee, Wisconsin,
... â€œIn the 1930s, Hitler and the German Nazis envisioned a world to be dominated and controlled by a Nazi philosophy of pan-Germanism. The German chemists worked out a very ingenious and far-reaching plan of mass-control, which was submitted to and adopted by the German General Staff. This plan was to control the population in any given area through mass medication of drinking water supplies. By this method they could control the population in whole areas, reduce population by water medication that would produce sterility in women, and so on. In this scheme of mass control, sodium fluoride occupied a prominent place.â€
Charles Perkins continued â€œrepeated doses of infinitesimal amounts of fluoride will in time reduce an individual's power to resist domination, by slowly poisoning and 'narcotising' a certain area of the brain, thus making people submissive to the will of those who wish to govern them.â€ He referred to it as 'convenient light lobotomy'.
The real reason behind water fluoridation is not to benefit children's teeth, he said. If this was the true motivation there were many ways in which it could be done that were much easier, cheaper, and far more effective, he points out. The real purpose behind water fluoridation is to reduce the resistance of the masses to domination, control and loss of liberty. Perkins said that â€œwhen the Nazis under Hitler decided to go into Poland, both the German General Staff and the Russian General Staff exchanged scientific and military ideas, plans and personnel, and the scheme of mass control through water medication was seized upon by the Russian communists because it fitted ideally into their plan to 'communise' the world. Perkins said:
â€œ I was told of this entire scheme by a German chemist who was an official of the great I.G. Farben chemical industries and was also prominent in the Nazi movement at the time.â€ He went on to say with all sincerity having dedicated almost twenty years' research into chemistry, biochemistry, physiology and pathology of fluorine - any person who drinks artificially-fluorinated water for a period of one year or more will never again be the same person mentally or physically.
It is nothing less than global fascism and so how appropriate that Codex Alimentarius was instigated by those who controlled I.G. Farben, the pharmaceutical cartel at the heart of the Nazi war machine. It ran the concentration camp at Auschwitz. The cartel was made up of corporations like BASF, Bayer and Hoechst, which, of course, still exist today. I.G. Farben was the biggest single funder of Hitler's election and made fantastic profits from the Second World War. A US government investigation in 1946 concluded that, without I.G. Farben, the war in which more than fifty million died would not have been possible. It also used concentration camp inmates to test unsafe pharmaceutical drugs and vaccines that killed many. The Nuremberg War Crime Tribunal prosecuted twenty-four Farben executives and board members for crimes against humanity, including mass murder and slavery. Telford Taylor, the US lead prosecutor at Nuremberg, said of the Farben executives: Not the Nazi lunatics but these accused are responsible for this war. And if they are not punished for these crimes the harm they will do to future generations is much greater than Hitler could ever have done if he were alive.
That is precisely what they have done. Those that Telford Taylor condemned and warned about were allowed to resume their posts with Hoechst, Bayer and BASF, the 'Farben Three', thanks to ... Nelson Rockefeller, US Under-secretary of State and former Farben business partner. One of them, Fritz ter Meer, the highest-ranked 'scientist' on the Farben board, had said of human experiments in the concentration camps: 'Forced labour did not inflict any remarkable injury, pain, or suffering on the detainees, particularly since the alternative for these workers would have been death'. It was ter Meer who devised the notorious slogan at the entrance to Auschwitz: 'Arbeit mach frei' ('Work makes you free'). (Extracted from a book I have read but cannot recall, but the content is far too important to exclude from this document).
All of this is ancient history, so why rake it all up now?
The truth is our society has been constructed upon one major lie after another, deception is but a minor part the greater majority of global citizens have suffered ? National Socialism was no more than a by product on an evil that the New World Order supported and propagated financially. The birth and demise of Communism suffered the same fate in order to centralise wealth, and segregate it into zones of control. Democracy as we know it is no more than farcical and can simply be illustrated by looking at the obverse of a voting slip and its stub left in the hands of the authorities which clearly identifies your so called private vote.
People may well be forgiven for rejecting such dictatorships as those of Uncle Jo Stalin, or Adolf Hitler but the truth is, the global dictatorship is all but totally invisible and its imposition gradual but no less insidious. Democracy as a concept is little more than a sham and the wars conducted to preserve that democracy are actually con strewed to ensure the unseen elite maintain and strengthen their grip on humanity seen as little more than worker ants. And what is so stunningly clever is that the term 'New World Order' is becoming a regular part of daily vocabulary and further reinforced by countless films and TV programmes on the subject. Tacit acceptance is slow but sure.
Freedom is under siege and we're watching from the wings, as for those who fought to preserve our way of life, they deserve more from us.
Confusion may arise as to why the Illuminati would promote extreme politics doomed to failure?
If you compare a horse race, own both horses, own the stables, the trainer, the jockeys and all the food provision plus the racecourse itself. As well as being completely immune to the disappointment of losing, or loss should one of them fall and be destroyed, then a win win situation prevails.